Martz Is In

Its finally over.  After almost four weeks of interviews and candidates coming in and out of Halas Hall then either going somewhere else or not being offered a job, the Bears finally have their man, or at least a man that wants the job.  Mike Martz officially agreed to a 2 year deal to become the team’s offensive coordinator.

Now we all know about the embarrassing mess that was the search for someone to fill this spot, so for the sake of Bears fans everywhere I won’t bother re-living it in the article.  What I would like to do is talk about why I don’t think this is such a bad choice.

For starters, I had a feeling this would happen nearly a month ago.  Before Ron Turner was fired even though we all knew he would be at seasons end, I had a feeling Martz’s name would pop up, if for no other reason than he coached with Lovie in St. Louis.  Every Bear fan knows that Lovie actively pursues anyone with ties to the Rams of the late 90′s and early 2000′s.  Remember Adam Archaletta?  Then Orlando Pace and Rod Mirenelli.    This should come as no surprise.

The only reason I find this surprising is because reports indicated that Jerry Angelo had told Lovie that he couldn’t hire Martz the very day Turner got the ax (reports the AM 670 radio broadcaster who broke them still swears are true).  And that may very well be true.  Perhaps Angelo never really had anything against hiring Martz but he knows how Lovie fixates on individuals he has experience with from the Rams organization and just wanted him to expand his search some and not settle on Martz before seeing what other fish were in the sea so to speak.  And if that’s the case, I don’t have a problem with Angelo doing that.  But I don’t think it was the exploring of other options that bothered fans.  I think it was the perception that the Bears lacked anything resembling a plan in this search that really frustrated people the most.

Despite the process, I actually think this was a decent hire for Lovie.  I’m not saying that there wasn’t possibly better candidates out there, but I think Lovie could have done worse and there are things that I like about Martz coming to the Bears.  For starters, Lovie trusts him as a coach.  Lovie is known for his stubbornness and for wanting coaches to do things his way, even offensive coaches.  There were times this past season when Lovie told Ron Turner to mix more runs into the play calling even though that wasn’t there best chance for success.  I don’t think that will happen with Martz.  Because of their experience with each other and Lovie’s obvious respect for Martz, he will have more freedom than Turner had to call the game the way he wants to without as much interference from Lovie, and the less Lovie interferes with the offense the better.

I also think it will be good for Cutler to have a coordinator that really appreciates what he is capable of and will know how to get the most out of him.  Every quarterback Martz has ever worked with had a better year the first year with him than the year before.  He turned Jon Kitna into a 4000 yard quarterback on a bad Lions team so I think there is a lot of hope for seeing progress with Cutler next season.

It will also be interesting to see how he uses the running backs and receivers.  Martz is a guy the demands perfection when it comes to running routes in his offense.  A 10 yard route doesn’t mean 10 yards and 1 foot, it means 10 yards exactly and he won’t tolerate anything less than getting it perfect.  It could be a good opportunity for the young receivers on this team to really develop.  He also loves to use running backs in his passing game.  Backs in his offense can expect to get up to 80 catches or possibly more, Marshall Faulk had nearly 100 a couple times, and Forte is very good at catching the ball from the running back spot (its probably what he really does best) so I think there is something there Martz can really take advantage of that Ron Turner seemed to completely overlook last year.

Egos aside, there are only 2 real concerns I have about this hire.  First, QBs take a lot of hits in Martz’s system.  He likes to run longer passing routes that require 5 to 7 step drops for the quarterback which leaves him back in the pocket for longer and with no hot reads.  You need good offensive line play for this kind of system to really be successful and as all Bears fans know, the offensive line hasn’t been what you would call a strength in recent years.  My other concern is with the tight ends.  Martz doesn’t utilize them much in the passing game unless its to keep them in as extra blockers to allow the quarterback time to make those 5 to 7 step drops.  The Bears are as deep as any team in the league when it comes to pass catching tight ends and it would be a waste to not incorporate them into the offense more than he has in the past.

But all in all, I think this was a good hire.  Martz will definitely be more aggressive with his play calling than Ron Turner was, which is something that I really like.  They will push the ball up and down the field and really put pressure on the defense.  It’ll be a big change from what we have seen from the Bears offense over the last couple decades when they have been content to run the ball in the red zone and settle for field goals.  Lovie brought in one of the best passing minds of the last 50 years so no longer will we have to hear him say “we get off the bus running” because that’s not what Mike Martz does best and its not why he was brought here.

9 Comments

  1. Adam says:

    It will be nearly impossible for Cutler not to improve next season. Even if he went blind during the off season there would be a chance he would throw fewer interceptions next year.

    I am definitely stoked that the Bears won’t be a run run pass punt team any longer. I definitely want a stronger passing game and I think Cutler can do it given some time in the pocket and some Knox growth.

    I would hate to see our tight ends become blockers. I want to see them running slants and getting concussions over the middle.

    Adam

    Reply
  2. Ryan says:

    Well everyone knows that Greg Olsen isn’t anything close to a good blocker, but Desmond Clark is and so is Kellen Davis. Its possible, with limited free agents available because of the labor situation and no first or second round draft picks, that the Bears try to trade him for a second round picks. There are a few teams out there with multiple 2nd round picks that could use a tight end like Olsen. The Patriots for example have three 2nd rounders and are likely to lose their starting tight end. Might not be a bad idea.

    I would even be open to trading Hester. With the emergence of Aromashodu and Knox along with Earl Bennett, Hester may become the fourth option. Then you still have Iglesias who is likely to get a lot of reps. Also, Knox is a pretty damn good kick returner along with Manning. Hester is another guy that could be expendable and might get a 2nd round pick for, or at least a 3rd and 4th rounder package.

    I would move both Olsen and Hester under those circumstances. It doesn’t hurt the team much in the present and makes it better in the future.

    Reply
  3. Adam says:

    I would love to see Hester and Urlacher go.

    I am too fond of white guys that catch passes over the middle. I miss me some T-Dub, so I would like to see Olsen stay.

    Reply
  4. David says:

    Two things make the hire of Martz a bad decision for the Bears. First, THEY DON”T HAVE AN OFFENSIVE LINE!! Cutler will be lucky to get out of the 1st game with his head still attached to his body. I say the 1st 5 step drop he does he ends up on his ass missing his front teeth. Second, don’t forget Martz ripped Cutler this past year openly in the media, don’t think this relationship won’t take some time to mend.

    Now all the talk here about trading the tight ends. I say no, Olsen is the best pass receiver we have. Just use double tight end formations keeping Desmond in as a blocker & sending Olsen down field. We need to get rid of Urlacher & Hester but Urlachers’ contract is too hefty for his age and physical condition, no one will want him. We can get rid of Hester rather easily though and then we need to start building that offensive line. If we don’t revamp the O-line before the start of next season this offense is still grounded no matter who’s running it.

    Reply
  5. jason says:

    I like having Martz on the team now how about the d Coordinator. Now if your suggesting trading Hester or Olsen, how about them for Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall or even Braylon Edwards.

    Reply
    • David says:

      I like the ideas Jason but it won’t matter if we don’t build the offensive line first. Cutler will never have the time to get the ball to any of them!

      Reply
  6. David says:

    Well, this year the Bears don’t have any upper round draft choices. They traded them away to get Cutler and Gaines. So unless they get lucky and get a “Richard Dent” type player in one of the lower rounds who can be an offensive line player they’re going to have to go through a trade. Hester is the most valuable trade bait they have that they can afford to get rid of at this point. That’s what I was getting at earlier, get rid of Hester and start rebuilding the o-line. I also believe they have enough young wide receivers (I know that’s a stretch for a lot of people) to get rid of one of them (anyone but Knox) and get another o-line player with a draft choice. I know it would be a young o-line going through the draft process but anything is better than what we have now. With Martz (I don’t really care for him) in charge if we can just get Cutler a little time he’s good enough that he could probably make something happen with Olsen and a couple of the young receivers we would have left. In other words Jason, I don’t think the Bears have any choice at this point to be somewhat successful next year other than to go the trade route for some 2nd and 3rd round draft choices for the o-line and start them next year.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Powered by WordPress | Deadline Theme : An AWESEM design